unrecovered: (Face: Uh-huh)
Agent Washington ([personal profile] unrecovered) wrote in [community profile] thelegion2017-04-25 11:50 am

[Video | Filtered to Legionnaires Only] Technically, Parody Is Fair Use

[Wash looks a bit better than he did a week ago; turns out a successful mission and a plan for the future really do help.]

We've all seen the Legionnaire Legacies, and I'm pretty sure we're all tired of them. Well, Mirage is a genius, and she had an idea: we'll make fake ones. Use our Anywhere Machine to pull real footage, create fake footage to supplement it, write our own narratives, and broadcast them. It'll discredit the press, and it might keep them off our backs, because there's no reason to broadcast someone's past if it's already been done by someone else.

So. Who's in?
saltsweet: (★ 007)

[personal profile] saltsweet 2017-04-29 01:23 pm (UTC)(link)
That brings us right back to the top, then.

[ She heaves a sigh. ]

This is a mess.
prettycoolguy: (Default)

[personal profile] prettycoolguy 2017-04-29 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Just because we don't know where it is now doesn't mean we can't find out.

Then we act.
saltsweet: DO NOT TAKE - custom edit (★ 072)

[personal profile] saltsweet 2017-04-29 07:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Which is great in its own right, don't get me wrong. But I don't see fake Legacies as an important part of tracking down and decommissioning that Anywhere Machine. I get the idea of using them as a distraction, but I'm sure there's better distractions we could make that don't rely on trying to mislead the general populace of the entire universe.
prettycoolguy: (8)

[personal profile] prettycoolguy 2017-05-01 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Not the entire universe.

Just the populace that believes trashy news.
saltsweet: (★ 013)

[personal profile] saltsweet 2017-05-04 06:44 pm (UTC)(link)
But the truth will still get out eventually. Even if we take out the other Anywhere Machine, these fake Legacies can still blow up in our face someday and damage the Legion's reputation.
prettycoolguy: (13)

[personal profile] prettycoolguy 2017-05-05 05:20 am (UTC)(link)
Not critically.

[ He doesn't think it would do enough to seriously discredit the team in any arena that matters. ]
saltsweet: (pic#)

[personal profile] saltsweet 2017-05-11 04:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess that's a matter of perspective. How do you define 'critically?'
prettycoolguy: (2)

[personal profile] prettycoolguy 2017-05-13 03:02 am (UTC)(link)
To the point we can't overcome.
saltsweet: (★ 002)

[personal profile] saltsweet 2017-05-13 07:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not sure you could be more vague...
prettycoolguy: (13)

[personal profile] prettycoolguy 2017-05-14 05:16 am (UTC)(link)
You asked.

[ He's not bothered by her dissatisfaction with his answer, it's good enough for him. ]